The Municipality of Magnetawan Ratepayers Association

Incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario #1608026
P.O. Box 108
Magnetawan, Ontario
POA 1PO
e-mail: director@magratepayer.ca

Our Vision

It is the vision of the Municipality of Magnetawan Rate payers Association to accomplish our mission through lawful influence upon members of the Municipality of Magnetawan council on such matters as are their responsibility. The objectives of the association shall be to foster and advance the interests of all the rate payers of the Municipality of Magnetawan without favouring any single person.

Membership in The Municipality of Magnetawan Rate payers Association is open to all Rate payers in The Municipality of Magnetawan both seasonal and permanent, Canadian or American.

This web site will present the views of the Association and it's membership.


The Municipality of Magnetawan Election - 2010

Clich here for the election results

The information provided on this page is for the benefit of all voters in the Municipality of Magnetawan. As you will note we have a "Mail in Ballot" .You can now vote in the privacy of your own home.

If you want more details about the mail in ballot you may also check the Municipal web site at: www.magnetawan.com

Any property owner over the age of 18 yrs. is eligible to vote in a municipal election,as long as they, their spouse, tenant and resident, are a Canadian Citizen or landed immigrant.

The views and comments expressed here are not necessarily those of the Ratepayers Association and only represent those of the candidates standing for election.

Municipal election candidate information

At our annual meeting in July a number of issues of concern were raised by our membership. A draft of ideas was gathered. These were formulated into questions which were approved by the board at a meeting in early September. When nominations closed Sept 10th, we gathered the contact information for each candidate and sent out an e-mail on September 13-14 with the questions you will note below. We also hand delivered to candidates, with out e-mail access, a copy of the questions. The dead line for submission was September 24th. We also sent a follow up e-mail and phone call Sept 21-23 asking the candidates who had not submitted for their replies. We extended the deadline to allow for late submissions. Following are the comments we have . . .

Click on the name of the candidate to see their profile:

For Mayor Sam Dunnett See note below Tony Pratas Dick Smith
For Council Jack Crossman Charlie Gray Bryan Hampson No reply received Russ Ivison Carman Jarvis
Barry Mutton No reply received Kris Nicholls Patti Paul Bill Stewart Frank Tod

Each Candidate was asked the following question . . .

It is redundant for those who have been on previous councils to mention strengths involving experience (some of which is not good) and for the others to say that they bring new ideas, which is obvious. Other than these qualifications, what are the reasons that you believe that you are particularly suited to the position to which you aspire. Their answer is below their photo and contact information. . .

The order of listing is the order we received replies to the questionnaire we sent out. No editing was done except to limit length of reply.
 

Frank Tod
RR # 2, Burk’s Falls, ON
705-382-1074
ftod@onlink.net

Carmen Jarvis

Carmen Jarvis

cjroad@hotmail.com

No photo provided

Jack Crossman

No e-mail

Questions for the Candidates

My decision to run for re-election was based on many considerations but there are three pressing issues I would like to bring to fruition.
• There is a very real danger of the Parry Sound District losing its northern status. Magnetawan’s huge financial benefits and various service programs resulting from this northern designation would then dissipate. I will continue in my lobbying efforts to remain “part of the north”.
• I will continue to apply pressure for the creation of a long-term Economic Growth/Strategic Plan along with a Business Retention and Expansion program. In order to maintain financial stability, encourage tourism and lower taxation rates, it is just plain common sense that we create a comprehensive and systematic plan for the future.
• While there are numerous other high-priority issues such as landfill and waste management, mandatory shoreline property septic inspections, restoring public confidence in the fire department and stricter by-law enforcement, I will continue to work towards a means of improved access to medical care in Magnetawan. This is a crucial issue not only to benefit our permanent and seasonal citizens but also to attract future residents to this area.

For the past twenty two years Magnetawan has been an excellent home for my husband and I to raise our children. The warmth and generosity of this community has helped contribute greatly to the success of our family, and the development of our children into well rounded adults. Running for council gives me the opportunity to give back to this community. I would like to ensure positive growth for such a unique and beautiful geographical area and work for the wellbeing of our citizens The reason I am running for council is that is that ever since Pauline and I moved here I have been amazed and disappointed with the amount of divisiveness that exists in our municipality. Throughout my life I have been constantly amazed at the results a group of people can achieve when they put personal feelings aside and start working together towards a common goal. I hope to be given the opportunity to help facilitate that attitude in our community. The future of our beautiful community lies not with the residents of Spence, or Chapman, or Croft, or the Village or Ahmic Harbour. It’s not about the ratepayers association, the Ahmic Lake, Lake Cecebe, Horn Lake cottagers associations; it’s not about the business association, the firefighters, the Lions Club, the Library, or the school. It is about recognizing that all of these groups and people are the generous hardworking taxpaying citizens of the Municipality of Magnetawan. I want to help set the goals and make the plans that will allow us to accommodate the wants and needs of as many of them as possible. Note from the web master: we asked all candidates to answer the questions shown at the left. We received a" mail out" from Jack which did not address the questions we asked.
1. What is your position on the use the mail in ballot? If elected would you promise to keep it?
My position on the mail in ballot is clear, I have supported it in the past and will continue to do so. I am in favour of the mail in ballet. This gives the whole community an opportunity to vote. In the true spirit of democracy this seems an appropriate course of action. I would like to know the effectiveness of the mail in vote before I would promise to keep it. All over the world jurisdictions are searching for ways to increase the level of participation of registered voters in the democratic process. I see the mail in ballot as one way of achieving that goal. I support it and I will continue to support i  
2. Are you in favour of the current “Tendering Process”? How would you suggest changing it?
It is apparent that the current Procurement By-Law (tendering) requires upgrading with clarification in some areas and I am definitely in support of more stringent procedures. Without complete information regarding the current tendering policies I could not make a definitive answer, favorable or not. What is important is to have a fair tendering policy in effect and maintain absolute compliance and transparency All tenders should be opened in public. Acceptance of any tender must be by an approved motion in council  
3. As a sitting councilor did you participate in a cost benefit analysis of recent major expenditures relating to the new garage or the modification to the community Centrex? As an aspiring councilor what is your position re cost benefit analyses?
The present Council examined costs versus benefits to the community prior to voting on the resolution to proceed with upgrading the municipal infrastructure. While I was personally not in favour of some aspects of this project, the overall benefits to the community will be felt for many years to come. Cost benefit analysis is important firstly, to decipher whether funding permits a project, secondly, to decide if the project will benefit the community sufficiently and thirdly, to indicate whether or not the project was a success. Benefits are not always in dollars. Cost benefit analyses are very useful prior to purchases of a significant item or service, however value added must also be determined. Decisions based on cost alone are not always the best decisions.  
4. Would you support public consultations on major expenditures over $100,000? Would you support enacting a by-law requiring public consultations?
Any time the public becomes involved with input in any project at any time is positive, in my opinion. Certainly I would support a by-law requiring public consultation for expenditures over $100,000. Public consultation can rapidly become expensive to a municipality. E-mail, phone calls and open communication with the electorate should suffice. That being said, if there appears to be a lot of dissension throughout the municipality regarding large expenditures, town meetings should be another forum, to facilitate the community’s needs. An expenditure of $100,000 is approximately 1.5% of budget, and about $27.00 per taxpayer. Special interest groups often derail public consultations. The public should be made aware of these expenditures so they may express their views to council either by delegation or personal contact. A higher number would be appropriate.  
5. Are you in favour of a ward system for municipal elections? If so why? If not why?
Ontario legislation provides municipal councils to be elected ‘at large”. Implementing a ward system would require extensive public consultations to determine the number and type of wards. If, by referendum, the voters decided to create a ward system, I would support the majority vote. A ward system can be a good system, although at this time our energy should be concentrated on unity not division. There are positives and negatives to a ward system. This topic is too large for 50 words. I am in favour of all taxpaying citizens being represented by an honest hardworking duly elected council. Ward systems tend to narrow the field of viable candidates.  
6. Are you in favour of a “Roads Committee? Fire Committee? Other Committees?
Committees that make recommendations to council are beneficial in many ways. It allows for public input and greater opportunities for interaction and improved communication on key issues. A budget advisory committee, for example, would ensure an appropriate and comprehensive budget process is established. Knowledgeable committees are an important part of a community that help council with the ongoing issues and concerns of the citizens. Yes I am in favour of committees. The only committee I would add at present would be a Fire committee.  
7. Are you in favour of having a “Fire Master Plan” for the community?
I would support a “Fire Master Plan”. Our fire department is a critical service in our municipality. I am undoubtedly in favour of any plan that facilitates the service of our community while understanding the needs of our volunteer fire fighters in order to get the job done. Proper fire protection service is a major concern of all our citizens. A well trained, well directed fire department working under a Fire Master Plan must have high priority for future council. I definitely will make it a priority for myself. .  

Each Candidate was asked the following question . . .

It is redundant for those who have been on previous councils to mention strengths involving experience (some of which is not good) and for the others to say that they bring new ideas, which is obvious. Other than these qualifications, what are the reasons that you believe that you are particularly suited to the position to which you aspire. Their answer is below their photo an contact information. . .

 

Patti Paul
387-4954, cell: 783-4121
e-mail: plpaul@hotmail.com

William H. (Bill) Stewart
(705) 380 3478
Box 74
4275 Hwy. 520
Magnetawan P0A-1P0

williamstewart455@msn.com

Questions for the Candidates
During the last four years as your Councillor, I have enjoyed working for you and have brought about what I believe are improvements to our area. I left Magnetawan, only to receive my education: 1 year at Sheridan College in Graphic Design, 3 years Bachelor of Arts at York University. Over the years, I’ve volunteered for many groups including the Recreation Committee, Agricultural Society and the Magnetawan Area Business Association; all in an attempt to make life in our area more interesting for young and old with events to help put Magnetawan on the map. I have been the manager of the Farmer’s Market for 18 years, which is a major attraction during the summer. I have also helped with the Wood n Things Rendezvous which is working towards making Magnetawan a village famous for our wood carvings. I would like to continue working for you for the next 4 years and carry on with making our area a better place to live. After serving on council for the past 4 years, I have gained a better understanding of municipal practices and procedures plus what the responsibilities are of the individual that is the Head of Council. By following and adhering to the Municipalities Procedural By-Law and the Municipal Act in regards to these duties, I feel that I can provide our new council and our constituents with a higher level of honesty, fairness, accountability, transparency and integrity to the position of Mayor. Leadership with improvement in communications amongst council, staff and our ratepayers are paramount in regards to this community moving forward. These are all qualities that I demonstrated as a councillor in the past term and look forward to serving this community with our constituents best interests in mind at all times.

Note from the web master: Charlie gave us a a letter which we will reproduce here. Is does answer some of the questions raised. It is NOT in the format requested.


I was born and educated in Sundridge and went to work In Algonquin Park in a logging camp at a young age. From there I went on to become a heavy equipment operator working on highways, railroads, airports, city streets. subdivisions and county roads. My ability to be a leader took me through the ranks and eventually I became a project supervisor on a highway rebuilding project - the 401 Highway.

I built a saw mill and ran my own business for over 40 years in this municipality.. During this time I became a real estate entrepreneur, and have owned a lot of acreage in Parry Sound and Muskoka Districts.

I was a member of the Local Roads Board in this area for several years and o member of the Agricultural Society. I was chairman of the Building Committee when the present Community Center was built and would like to have had the opportunity to have some input into the building project that is underway at this time. I think that every aspect of this community needs to be looked at by this next council.

I am not convinced that the spending of tax dollars in this municipality over the last four years has been in the best interest of the rate payer. It is my ambition to see that you the tax payers, know where every dollar goes, who they are paid to and what for. With this information you would have a better understanding of where your money is going than with the system we have today.

Before any large amount of money is spent, it should be discussed with the public and analyzed by all.

The mail in vote seems to be quite popular and I would not do away with it. Committees are a great idea, but all should be under the guidance of Council

The qualifications that I would bring to the council table are as follows, I have lived in the Magnetawan area all of my life, 47 years. I was the owner of a small bussiness for twenty five years. I am now the road supervisor for another municipality, this has given me a very good understanding of how a municipality works, such as how by-laws and resolutions are used in the governance of a municipality. I have belonged to the Magnetawan Fire Department for about 2 years and have seen how that organization has struggled and has improved and hope that this will continue in the future.
1. What is your position on the use the mail in ballot? If elected would you promise to keep it?
I do agree with the “mail-in” ballot. It is helpful for the large number of rate-payers who do not live full-time in this area and for the elderly and shut-ins who do live here. The “mail-in” vote is a green, eco-friendly way to vote for your new Council! As the former Chair of the Ratepayers Association, the information regarding the elimination of the Mail -In-Voting System was reported, posted and circulated. The former Appointed Mayor indicated that the system was marred in fraud. No ratepayer should be disenfranchised from voting. Instrumental in returning the Mail-In-Vote, it is here to stay. I feel that a mail in ballot affords all residents, both permenant and seasonal a chance to have thier say as to how we move into the future.
2. Are you in favour of the current “Tendering Process”? How would you suggest changing it?
It is not always possible with time constraints on some projects to have the tenders opened at Council meetings. However, I do believe there should be Council representation when the tenders are opened. Any member of Council or the Mayor should be available as witness to the tender openings. The current Procurement By-Law is in definite need of a major overhaul. The optics of transparency needs to be improved with the public being able to witness the tender openings, the municipality advertising all projects, eliminating tenders by invitation only, etc. The Procurement By-Law being continually waived shows poor financial responsibility on the part of council. The tendering process is or should be governed by a Procurment By-law which should be reviewed on a regular basis.
3. As a sitting councilor did you participate in a cost benefit analysis of recent major expenditures relating to the new garage or the modification to the community Centrex? As an aspiring councilor what is your position re cost benefit analyses?
I did participate in cost benefit analysis for the new projects: the expansion of the Community Centre – Library, and the Public Works Garage. There were options presented to Council and the public, and in the end the most cost efficient and reasonably priced projects were chosen to benefit the Municipality into the future. There were public meetings to discuss the rewarded Stimulus Grant Fund and on how to best use the funding to address the Municipalities needs. There were no consultants used to provide council with a Cost/Benefit Analysis. I tried to have funding also address the need for additional services to our community, such as Health Care. Infrastructure of these two buildings will not have to be addressed for the next 50 years Not Applicable
4. Would you support public consultations on major expenditures over $100,000? Would you support enacting a by-law requiring public consultations?
Any purchase of equipment for the Public Works, i.e. new dump truck, new grader, or simply purchasing gravel for our roads would all qualify for “over $100,000.” I would support a bylaw for public consultation for larger cost projects that could be discussed and decided by the new Council. I would support a By-Law, if presented by council, to allow for public consultations on any Infrastructure project exceeding $100,000. Council is designed to operate in the public’s best interests; therefore public input is imperative in decision making. Capital expenditures on equipment exceeding $100,000 are budgeted years in advance with funds placed in reserves. I feel that shuold be willing to listen to all concerns about expenditures but I also feel that some expenditures are an anual occurance and public consultation would cause many delays and possibly increase the costs associated with these expenditures.
5. Are you in favour of a ward system for municipal elections? If so why? If not why?
Population is scant in some of our areas year round. This could leave a small number of potential candidates to even consider running for office. I think it is more important to find candidates that are qualified and capable for the job as opposed to a ward system in our area. As a councillor over the past 4 years, I have not received any correspondence, verbal contact or witnessed any delegates making a presentation at a council meeting regarding creating a Ward System in our Municipality and having it become part of the Municipal Election. Members on council proactively look at the community as a whole and not as per former boundaries or townships. I would not be in favour of a ward system as I feel that it could cause a lopsidedness at the council table due to the grouping of population within the Municipality.
6. Are you in favour of a “Roads Committee? Fire Committee? Other Committees?
I am in favour of Committees but it is sometimes difficult to find volunteers to sit on them. Not everyone wants to devote their free time and efforts for the community. In addition, difficulties could arise if members of the committee do not have the expertise in that field. All committees are beneficial to council. By having open lines of communication, decisions can be more easily made by understanding the issues and concerns that are at hand. Individuals that serve on these committees must also be treated with dignity, respect and council must recognize their services to the community. Constituents concerns usually dictate which new committees get created by council. I feel that the council is or should be a part of these committies but should also listen to the staff that has been hired to do a perticular job for the municipality.
7. Are you in favour of having a “Fire Master Plan” for the community?
I would be in favour of looking at establishing a Fire Master Plan. I feel it would give accountability, purpose and structure to our Fire Department and would create benchmarks where the fire-fighters and the community could compare their progress of the steps of the plan. A Fire Master Plan Study is critical for the new council to address and implement. A group consisting of a consultant, neighbouring communities Fire Chief’s, former and current Municipality of Magnetawan firefighters, and retired professional firefighters need to help the Municipality address growth, capital equipment, facilities and the organizational structure. A game plan is needed, not individual council members micro managing. The answer to this question could be very long depending on what type of plan, but I will say that a plan of some sort should be looked at in the near future.

Each Candidate was asked the following question . . .

It is redundant for those who have been on previous councils to mention strengths involving experience (some of which is not good) and for the others to say that they bring new ideas, which is obvious. Other than these qualifications, what are the reasons that you believe that you are particularly suited to the position to which you aspire. Their answer is below their photo an contact information. . .

 

Kris Nicholls
705 387 1260
kris.nicholls@hotmail.com

Dick Smith

Richard (Dick) Smith
705-387-1227
rsmith002@sympatico.ca

Sam Dunnett

Arrowprt@aol.com

Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:57 AM

Subject: reply to questionnaire

To whom it may concern,
You may print this as my response to your questionnaire.
Upon receiving your questionnaire I phoned George Inch and requested that the words"former appointed" be removed from in front of the word Mayor. This title "former appointed Mayor"is attached to my name as a Mayoral candidate. As I explained to George Inch that placing the words "former appointed" in front of Mayor are only meant to be demeaning or a put down to my appointment. Mr Inch responded by saying " I'll have to check with Ken Turner and get back to you".In about 10 minutes he returned my call to relay Ken Turners reply "NO it will stay as is". I was shocked to say the least because the Magnetawan Ratepayers Association has a sitting board of directors. This elected and appointed board members were not advised or made aware of my request. It is interesting to note that Mr Turner is not a member of that board!. It is apparent that Mr.Turner and Mr Inch are now totally in control of, and the only directors or members of the Magnetawan Ratepayers Association.The total ownership by two people of a very large list of email addresses, they claim 500 former members, this is a very dangerous and sad situation.to be in the possession of two such people.
I am making the same request. Please remove the words "former appointed". If Mr. Turner and Mr. Inch agree to this request I will respond to the questionnaire. I will need 24 hours to respond.

Sam Dunnett Mayoral candidate"


Rate payer board reply

In reply to Sam's message
When Sam called me he objected to the notation "former appointed mayor" because he said "It is not a position. The only council positions are mayor or counciller". My reply was that I would get in touch with Ken and get back to him. I called Ken and we checked the notation. It was posted as "former appointed Mayor". Since the word "appointed" was not capitolized, it was not part of the title. I called Sam back to confirm this with him, at which time he became quite abusive. Since he felt so strongly about this very minor point, the other directors were consulted and it was decided to remove all position descriptions. This was done even though we felt that the descriptions were of interest to voters to be reminded who had previously been on Council and who were the presently incumbent members of Council. I don't remember if it was Thursday or Friday when the change was made but it was certainly before the weekend so there was still ample time for Sam to forward his answers to the questions, which he has obviously declined to do.

Questions for the Candidates
Magnetawan is the center jewel of the Parry Sound District. My wife and I have lived here for nine years and want to ensure it holds its distinction.

Retiring as a Fire Suppression and Station Captain after thirty one years of front line public service, having been elected to six terms as a trustee on the Mississauga Firefighter's Association, as well as a Credit Valley Hospital Foundation board member for four years, reflects leadership. These positions require an individual who stands for positive progress, common sense and the ability to carry themselves with presence!

I realize that on-going issues of maintaining Northern Status, lack of medical services, continued growth of our fire department, preservation of our Magnetawan River System, promotion of tourism and council's practices and procedures, are all subjects that will affect our future. Having a long history of fair play, honesty, and a no nonsense approach when making decisions or governing my personal ethics, I wish to continue sitting on committees that are directly involved with the Federal and Provincial Government, whom have great impact on our critical issues.

With the right leadership, the Municipality of Magnetawan will continue to " flourish " with a quality of living admired by all!
I believe it is important to compare what the Community was like in the past and what have been the changes that take it to its present state (good or bad). In that regard, I can remember Magnetawan in the early years as a rustic, clean, proud, self-sustaining area. That was 63 years ago. The various changes over the years have changed some of that. What bothered me in the late 90’s was the Marina fire in the Village. It seemed to stand there as a relic of what life used to be like in Magnetawan. My desire in running was to bring back some of that pride and in doing so make the Municipality a better place.
Achieving this takes the ability to have a vision of what you would like to accomplish. It also takes a lot of patience as the wheels of government generally move a lot slower than private industry. In addition, you require analytical ability to chart your course and keep things moving. There are many things that can require your attention (i.e. infrastructure, money, people and the divergence of ideas) to be assimilated in determining the course of action.
1. What is your position on the use the mail in ballot? If elected would you promise to keep it?
Democracy must allow the public to vote unrestricted. The mail in ballot system will increase voter participation.
I promised it in my last campaign and I will continue to support it.
I have always supported the mail in ballot and other alternative methods of voting. Democracy hinges on getting the people’s opinion. We have a substantial population that makes Magnetawan their second home and they are entitled to the right to vote.
2. Are you in favour of the current “Tendering Process”? How would you suggest changing it?
The tendering process has already come under the scrutiny of current council. The procurement bylaw may need further clarification for further transparency.
Members of the public have always been able to attend tender openings. In actual fact, I have attended tender openings where members of the public have been present.
Like any process or policy there can always be improvement so long as it is effective and doesn’t impede the staff through delays and lost opportunities to save the Municipality money, or attempt to micro manage the staff.
3. As a sitting councilor did you participate in a cost benefit analysis of recent major expenditures relating to the new garage or the modification to the community Centrex? As an aspiring councilor what is your position re cost benefit analyses?
Receiving grants allowing improvement of infrastructure are a win win situation. I participated in "cost - benefit analysis" with council and professionally designated personnel.
Are our projects affordable? Absolutely! Benefits, both short and long term, far outweigh paying full freight on improvements that will be enjoyed by many future generations.
I am not a sitting Councillor however our Engineers provided Council with a cost benefit analysis of the projects. This went so far as to ask for an additional round of tenders, as the initial quote for the job was far too expensive for the work that had to be completed. It is a good process, however, there are other considerations that make up the package.
4. Would you support public consultations on major expenditures over $100,000? Would you support enacting a by-law requiring public consultations?
Daily operations in our municipality sometimes constitute expenditures over this amount! The complexities of departmental operations would be hampered with continuous public meetings. Infrastructure improvements do require public meetings. In fact, we have had several public meetings where our engineers and planners have addressed concerns. I support public consultation where necessary. We consult the public on major projects as we did on the current one. When budget planning takes place the public attends these discussions. All major expenditures are justified and approved or denied at this time. Acquisition of the item is scheduled during the year perhaps through a tendering process.
5. Are you in favour of a ward system for municipal elections? If so why? If not why?
Council's primary obligation is addressing all issues from a community perspective. A ward system focuses on " sharing the pie " instead of the well-being of the whole municipality. Magnetawan's population does not warrant a ward system. We all share the same geography and interests. Let's stay united. I would not be in favour, as we live in a rural area with great diversity as to where the people live. A ward system is more suited to a larger area with greater population densities. The Town of Kearney recently rejected the ward system of representation.
6. Are you in favour of a “Roads Committee? Fire Committee? Other Committees?
Often warranted and productive, we have many committees which I support. With regards to "departmental" committees, we have a chief administrative officer whom supervisors these departments and reports to council. Canvassing for public members in the past for waste management and property standards,we have had little to no response. Committees of Council are useful in some circumstances, providing you can recruit a sufficient number to participate, that have some knowledge of the subject, that they are being tasked to report on.
7. Are you in favour of having a “Fire Master Plan” for the community?
I would be in favour, however after researching the requirements, council could be locked into consultants and a very time consuming and costly endeavour. I'd like to take the preliminary step of inviting the Fire Marshall's Office in to perform a complete audit (free). Resulting recommendations may possibly lead to a Fire Master Plan. This is something that Magnetawan has to address in some form. We have an amalgamated Municipality and we need to have a review conducted of fire department requirements in a formal non-partisan way i.e. facilities, level of service, equipment, appropriate number of volunteers, etc.
Page view: Total:
We value your input please send us your comments.

Current Board of Directors

Peggy Grant - Director 387-1460

Marion Tilson - Director 387-3394

George Inch - Chairman 387-3730

Steve Jelly - Director 416-482-4540

Phil Catalano - Director 387-0605

Ken Turner - Director 387-3866

Terry_Thomas - Director 416-980-5149